Τετάρτη, 23 Σεπτεμβρίου 2015

Scarcity,the other name for greed

Scarcity in the view of the economists is explaining the inequalities of our world.They try to present poverty as a result of the "unlimited needs" of the humans.But is this true?Is it not an attempt to put the blame of all the problems of the market economy on  those who in reality have nothing to do with the results they themselves suffer?
Here is a paragraph from the   Principles of
Macroeconomics. OpenStax College. 19 March 2014. <http://cnx.org/content/col11626/latest>
"Scarcity means that human wants for goods, services and resources exceed what is available. Resources, such as labor,
tools, land, and raw materials are necessary to produce the goods and services we want but they exist in limited supply. Of
course, the ultimate scarce resource is time- everyone, rich or poor, has just 24 hours in the day to try to acquire the goods
they want. At any point in time, there is only a finite amount of resources available.

The Problem of Scarcity
Think about all the things you consume: food, shelter, clothing, transportation, healthcare, and entertainment. How do you
acquire those items? You do not produce them yourself. You buy them. How do you afford the things you buy? You work
for pay. Or if you do not, someone else does on your behalf. Yet most of us never have enough to buy all the things we want.
This is because of scarcity.
and it goes on to say :

If you still do not believe that scarcity is a problem, consider the following: Does everyone need food to eat? Does everyone
need a decent place to live? Does everyone have access to healthcare? In every country in the world, there are people
who are hungry, homeless (for example, those who call park benches their beds, as shown in Figure 1.2), and in need of
healthcare, just to focus on a few critical goods and services. Why is this the case? It is because of scarcity. Let’s delve into
the concept of scarcity a little deeper, because it is crucial to understanding economics."

What is presented as choice is in reality the bounds the few who control wealth set up,in order to justify their actions .
No human should have to make a choice whether they d have a health system or an education system.
If we were to actually measure the available wealth that could be used for these needs,we d find there are a lot more than needed by the humans on this planet.
We only have to redistribute wealth in a totally different manner,on a different basis than what has been the "choice" so far.(not really a choice,as it was inflicted upon society by few greedy people who in their effort to fulfill their perverted needs,bought consciousnesses ,and created generations of mercenaries .
When you start educating economists with a false premise,then you can arrive at any conclusion suits your needs.

Keeping people uneducated (as much as possible-only on a need to know basis-on their need for slaves basis )and promoting,financing,arming, helping in every possible way religions,and "movements"(see arab spring for an example),giving the false sense to people they are in control of their own lives.In reality ,they ve managed to create 2 worlds.

The one ,the world of those "willing",who try to survive and float on top by following the advice and instructions of the few(half of us dream of a job as managers of some company ,going to the office 9 to 5 and not giving a second thought about what the results of our "work" are.
Those who d think they protect and help others ,through institutions made up exactly for the reason to take the guilt out of the equation.(I am charitable person,therfore i do what i have to towards society as a human)...yea right...we all know what this help is and where it goes.How much of it is tax deductuable and how much returns as profits to the charitable people.Or they plainly pass the responsibility to the masses,so that since lots of people gave to a cause,it must be they feel responsible for it.And those who really are responsible hide in the many.

The other half is those who dont buy the myth of scarcity.
Those who believe they can have a fair world,a just and equal world,if only....if only they could educate,use the media,get in power and decision making positions and change the rules.The rules that were set up by those who could set them up,those with power.
Am i talking about communism?Of course not.
Not in the sense that today,there are no more ideologies as they used to.
Today ,the two conflicting sides of society are the rich and the poor.
There is no right or left.There is only humane and inhumane.
There is just or unjust.
And objectivity has got to be redefined.
We need to change radically the rules.
But in order to do that we need to first change our own personal rules.
How far are we prepared to go in order to survive?What is happiness and where do we seek to find it?Can we be happy and satisfied with mediocrity?
Doesnt evolution (if we are to take the naturalistic view) showing us the way?The big fish eats the smal fish etc...
Or are we to set the new rules as humans who understand what is good and what is bad,what s right and whats wrong.We are all born with an understanding of basics.
Kids can feel lies.
Everyone can feel when something they are doing is not right.

No matter how excited one is,there s always this moment of self check ,a moment we ,speaking to ourselves,admit reality as it is.And then ,try to hide it again and justify whatever it is we are doing wrong.(knowingly).

So there you have it,scarcity ,is nothing but a creation in order to justify greed.
If we understand that another human is dying from starvation ,we have a choice.,
Share our food,no matter how little it might be ,or not.
Yes we need to put the human back into society.
Because as it stands today (2015) society is everything but (human/humane.)

And for those who still believe Adam Smith s idea about division of labour and productivity is still something we should be considering,i only need you to fantasize you are in the shoes of a child, labouring in a sweat factory in SE Asia.Then we talk again.....

Κυριακή, 23 Αυγούστου 2015

ΗΠΑ,προσφυγια και πλουτος

Δεν ειναι οτι θελω να αναμασω τα παλια.
Αλλα ειναι αναποφευκτο το να αναφερθω στο αμερικανικο κεφαλαιο ,τους πολεμους που δημιοθργησε ανα τον κοσμο για να εχει το ιδιο κερδη.
Δεν μπορω να μην ριξω ευθυνη για οτι συμβαινει σημερα στην χωρα και στην λοιπη ανατολη στους αμερικανους πλουτοκρατες )τουλαχιστον ενα μεγαλο μερος τους,ειδικα αυτο που σε συνδυασμο με την ανοησια του Μπους εκανε εναν κοσμο ανω κατω.=
Αλλα βλεπετε εσεις κανεναν αμερικανο να λεει κατι για τους προσφυγες_Το εχουν ξεχασει ποιος τους δημοοιργησε.Με εντεχνο τροπο και αφου επι χρονια πατροναριζαν τους θρησκοληπτους και χρηματοδοτησαν τους ντοπιους παπαδες γιθα να κρατανε τον κοσμακη αμορφωτο και να μπορουν να τον κλεβουν ανενοχλητοι,τωρα ,εμεις λουζομαστε τις συνεπειες...
Μετα τον 2ο παγκοσμιο πολεμο ,το επαιξαν οι αμερικανοι βοηθοι της ευρωπης,για να αυξησουν τα κερδη τους.Σημερα σε μια ευρωπη που πεθαινει δεν τους ενδιαφερτει ,για αυτο δεν βλεπετε και σχεδια μαρσαλ να φτιαχνονται.
Εχουν ολα αφεθει στα χερια των ευρωπαιων,που κανουν τι___....αυτοκτονου ,χτυποντας ο ενας τον αλλο.

Αι σιχαματα ολοι ,σ αυτον τον πλανητη.
αι στο διαολο ολοι.